(hat tip Defamer)
First up, who knew Julian Lennon was a restauranteur?
Second up, suing like this isn't very christian of the very Christian In-N-Out Corporation.
Third up, I'm no legal expert, but it seems like suing for copyright infringement on an unoffical off menu item seems like a tough case to win.
Sure, everybody who goes to In-N-Out (and in this area that's almost everybody) knows there are lots of 'off menu' specialty orders that you can place (a partial list here), but I don't think that helps In-N-Out in this case. Seems to me you actually have to officially market something to claim a trademark or copyright on a phrase. I could be wrong here, and maybe this open secret, secret menu constitutes registered trademarks, and looking at the offical site, they do show the "R" in a circle after Animal, 3x3, 4x4, and Protein, so clearly they are claiming those as trademarks for food related products.
Still seems like they've hired some overzealous attorneys who have gotten a bit registered trademark and sue-happy.
Good for Julian Lennon for standing up to them and not altering the menu at Blowfish Sushi.
All this won't change the fact that In-N-Out is indeed what a hamburger is all about (maybe on my pilgrimage to the Kwik-E-Mart, I'll swing by the In-N-Out on Venice Blvd. about a mile east).
UPDATE: Noticed Tammy Bruce is also on this case. Must be a slow news day, not like anything is going on right now.
Showing posts with label Overzealous Attorneys. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Overzealous Attorneys. Show all posts
02 July 2007
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)