14 September 2006

Pissing Off Doug Morris

Mr. Morris, don't look, it will just raise your blood pressure as you imagine all the profits you are losing by these five dastardly examples of outright theft of your property.











How much revenue did I just rob UMG of? Alternately, how many units did I just push? (Obviously, take these linked videos as recommendations to buy each of these fantastic albums)
























Chopping Off Things In Spite of Other Things

UMG begins hurling threats against YouTube and their allowing the user community to continually violate UMG owned intellectual property.

Thing is, all those YouTube videos help sell albums of old artists. I bet if they tracked the rise and fall of old videos, they will find that their catalogue sales increase when a certain old video of some long forgotten act gets attention due to someone on YouTube infringing upon the copyright of some song and some old forgotten TV program.

Nobody uses YouTube as a jukebox, and it's not a replacement for having the music in a more usable format. Nor is the quality good enough that if you enjoy something on YouTube that if you really think it great, you would refrain from buying a DVD because you already got the images for free.

Rather than theft and infringement, the owners of intellectual property should view YouTube as the free advertising that it clearly is.

Intellectual property laws are overly restrictive and copyrights are maintained for an unreasonably long time.

The idiocy of music executives continues to be in full force

Morris related a frequent historical gripe often mentioned by music execs, saying the industry made a costly mistake in the 1980s when it agreed to give MTV free music videos. At the time, the industry saw the fledlging video trend as mere publicity to sell albums, rather than as a revenue generator itself.

"The poster child for this was MTV," Morris said. "Twenty-five years ago, they built a multibillion-dollar company on our software.


Many of the biggest selling albums of all time are 80s and early 90s recordings of middling quality that owe their popularity to all those videos that they 'gave away'. I'm guessing one of the reasons MTV no longer plays videos and has become all crappy reality TV, all the time, is that they'd rather produce low cost programming in house than pay large fees to advertise some other conglomerate's music acts.

No wonder all the folks wandering out of the UMG west coast headquarters down the street from me always look so depressed. They work for jerks like Doug Morris.

Weekly NFL Related Humiliation (Week TWO)

aka My Weekly Football Picks.

I'm going to limit the number of picks I make to just the four I have the greatest confidence in. Picking all the games is a chore, and as the schedule drags on, many games each week just aren't that interesting. This week especially, 7 of the 16 games have spreads of a touchdown or more, which suggests an expectation of blowout after blowout this week.

Now to the four games that would draw my interest for gaming purposes (odds taken from Vegas.com, the MGM/Mirage line, current as of 11:26 on 09/14/06)

Oakland at Baltimore (-12.5)
Take Baltimore and don't worry about giving up all those points. You have an immovable object (the Baltimore defense) being confronted by a listless, barely motile, highly resistable force. This could get ugly by the 3rd quarter, and the Raiders biggest hope to score would be that a 35 to 0 score by halftime leads to Baltimore benching all its starters on offense and defense. Garbage time points could screw up the almost 2 touchdown spread, but given last week's performance by both these teams, that seems highly unlikely. Not a game worth watching, but definitely one worth betting on.

Tampa Bay at Atlanta (-6)
Take Tampa Bay and the points. The spread on this is based on last week's performances by both teams. They expect many bettors to forget one thing, though. Tampa Bay's defensive schemes have continually baffled Michael Vick and the Bucs contain him better than any other team. I expect an upset here with Tampa Bay rebounding after getting blown out last week, and Atlanta having a letdown after destroying a good Carolina team.

Arizona at Seattle (-7)
Take Arizona and the points. Am I crazy? A team that made the Superbowl last year v. the Cardinals, and I'm taking the Cardinals on the road? Yes, yes I am (so long as I don't actually put up real money, it's easy). Arizona can score points in bunches, right now Seattle can't. Detroit's defense isn't that good to keep any team out of the end zone. The fault, last week lied with a Seattle offense that has troubles. Seattle still has an excellent defense, but Arizona, so long as Warner remains healthy, has one of the best offenses in football. I think the Cardinals offense will overwhelm the Seahawks defense, and the Seattle offense will stall out against a weak Arizona defense. It will be a fairly high scoring game, but it will remain close, so even though the Cardinals will probably still lose on the road, they will do so by less than a touchdown.

Washington at Dallas (-6)
Take Dallas at home, even though you have to give up six points. The Cowboys' home opener, should be a good one. DC is also coming off of a tought loss on Monday so are dealing with a short week. Dallas didn't look good in defeat last week, but the Redskins aren't the Jaguars, and Dallas has one more week of practice to get the timing between Bledsoe and Owens down. One thing that is definitely predictable about this game, you will be sick of all the mentions of TO and Tuna by sometime midway through the 3rd quarter. One of these teams is going to be 0-2 after this game and will have their rabid local media declaring the season a lost cause. I can't say that I'd be shocked if DC pulls this off, but I think the Cowboys have a more cohesive team right now and will prevail in this contest, and do so by at least 10 points.

The Sun Rising and the Sun Setting Seems to Have the Same Effect Also

(via Drudge)

BBCNews headline, "Pope's Speech Stirs Muslim Anger". Surprised? Anyone?

Didn't think so.

Even Andrew Sullivan found much to praise in the Pope's recent speech, and he has said some mighty unkind things about Benedict XVI, to say the least.

Seems like the very existence of non-Muslims, or even Muslims who interpret the Koran differently, stirs anger with a vocal, hopefully, minority (it gets harder and harder to believe that the crazies are the 'minority' within the Muslim world when they are the ones doing all the shouting. Moderates must start shouting back in great numbers).

13 September 2006

I'm Not Actually Surprised, but Still Disgusted

This article in Reuters might as well have been a direct translation from a piece from Granma.

If anything, the article in Granma is less gushing and fawning over Fidel than the Reuters article is.

Here's the opening two paragraphs
Ailing Fidel Castro is no longer bed-ridden and is working the telephone giving orders but whether he will make his first public appearance since falling ill and show up at a summit hosted by Cuba is still anyone's guess.

"Don't think he is lying back in bed ... he has a telephone!" his brother and acting president Raul Castro told Cuban reporters in comments posted on the Web site of the ruling Communist Party newspaper Granma.

So Reuters opens with the nearly exact same wording as Granma, and doesn't question the veracity of the published report of the party run newspaper in a dictatorship. You think they might exhibit a tad more skepticism. Here's the entire report from Granma's English edition that Reuters references above

FIDEL is no longer confined to his bed, and is becoming active again, according to comments on September 12 by General of the Army Raúl Castro, who was visibly enthusiastic about the rapid improvement in his brother’s health as he left a ceremony where the Benito Juárez International Prize was given to the five Cuban anti-terrorists imprisoned in the United States.

“I’m going to go see him right now,” Raúl remarked, as he greeted about 20 Cuban reporters, who bombarded him with questions about the Cuban president’s health. “Moreover, don’t think that he’s lying there in bed — he’s right next to the phone, keeping up on everything that’s going on,” he added cheerfully.

Previously, the first vice president had spent several minutes personally congratulating each of the family members who received the international award on behalf of Gerardo Hernández, Fernando González, Ramón Labañino, René González and Antonio Guerrero. (JGA)

Hard to tell them apart, really.

More Castro love can be found later in the same Reuters article

In a message to Cubans last week, Castro said he was well enough to receive some visiting leaders, but he indicated that might have to happen in private.

Delegates said they expect Castro, who has championed the cause of Third World countries for four decades, to speak to the summit at least in a brief televised address.


Doesn't that make you wish Castro had been more successful in spreading his revolutionary fervor throughout the Third World?

With 'champions' like Fidel, who needs enemies?

Despite the reports of Fidel's great vigor, the article mentions that

Cuba watchers say the summit will offer clues on the gravity of Castro's illness and whether a political succession has actually begun under his brother.

Some governments have used the meeting as an opportunity to get first hand information on where the West's only communist country is heading.


But if The Maximum Leader is so vigorous and healthy, why should anyone be worried about political succession?

I'm confused, it's as if Reuters doesn't really believe the pablum they served in the first paragraph of this same article.

Take That You Self Righteous Idiots Moments In Other Blogs' Comment Sections (The First in an Irregular Series)

I guess I owe these moonbats a debt of gratitude--it was their howling at Caterpillar that prompted me to take a serious look at the company, and it's been a pretty profitable investment.

Posted by: david foster on September 13, 2006 02:15 PM Permalink


The above comment was with regards to this Chicagoboyz post regarding the state of the PCUSA (PC stands more for 'political correctness' than it does 'Presbyterian Church', unfortunately).

Some Added Perspective on Iraq

Callimachus both at his own blog, and at Winds of Change posts an excellent interview with Katrina, who works for a firm doing the hard work of rebuilding, and in most cases just plain building given the utter lack of working infrastructure throughout most of the country, Iraq. Hopefully this piece will get the attention it deserves. Pajamas Media included a link to it in their Middle East round up for today which is nice, but I'm hoping as many eyeballs get drawn to this story as possible, and I'm also hoping that some legacy media outfits feel a bit ashamed that this story that they refuse to tell is being spread by bloggers instead of within their own organizations.

This story should transcend ideology. Whether you are left or right, were for or against the Iraq War before or after it happened, it's in everybody's best interest to understand what's going on over there as thoroughly as possible.

Here's a small bit to whet your appetite

I managed the hub. What started for me as a Girl-Friday job in the U.S. making travel arrangements and applying a few reports to contracts and data sheets with chat help from my boss turned into being the managerial hub in a foreign country, responsible for the schedules of two bosses, the engineers who worked under them, and the legal and accounting facilities we had expand back in the USA. I had been in college when I started, finished with a management degree in the medical field, and found myself in Iraq working between structural and civil engineers, government agencies and the legal and accounting sections back home.

If this is giving you a headache, you're not alone. It is impossible for me to express the strain of the workload taken on by my company and the many contractors and government agents we reported to. Factor in supply difficulties found in any large-scale job, add to that the fact that they were being performed in a war-torn country poor on finished resources, then add ongoing security problems to top it off, and you've got a work load of breath-taking proportions.

The contractors and government agency employees also often confronted major changes in requirements or massive amounts of recorded information they had no familiarity with whatsoever. It wasn’t any easier for them than it was for us.

This is stuff that needs to be understood to put the progress, or lack of progress, in perspective.

Why can't the Atlantic Monthly, or Newsweek or the New York Times or CNN find the time, screen time or column inches to do this kind of reporting?

Burnishing My Libertarian Credibility

(via Instapundit)

After reading this post at NRO regarding a suggestion from Andrew Stuttaford that the EU buy up the entire crop of opium being produced in Afghanistan.

I can't help but think of Peter Tosh.



Things that should be legalized, or at least decriminalized; all drugs (including the recreational use of pharmaceuticals) and alcohol, all gambling, all sexual exchanges between consenting adults whether or not money changes hands, and finally posession of concealed weapons by adults without felonies who have passed a safety training course.

Black markets are cash cows for criminal and terrorist organizations while distorting law enforcement and public policy decisions. History is pretty clear on that point, you can legalize activities and still limit them, often it's far easier to control activities that are legal than ones that are illegal.

Maybe He'll Come Out of Hiding and Make His Move

(via Drudge)

Osama Bin Laden's favorite singer appears to be headed towards being single again.

How will he resist the siren call of Ms. Houston now that she's soon single?

The CIA will just have to spread rumors that she's paying a visit to troops in Kabul and set a trap for that rat.

Speaking of rumors, a rumor I'd like to see gain traction is as follows (in press release form to make it easy for news media)

In a stunning development, a plastic surgeon who requested anonymity, claims to have travelled to an undisclosed location in Waziristan and operated on Osama Bin Laden himself. According to this doctor, Bin Laden has completed a total M2F gender reassignment. The doctor also claims that despite the primitive facilities, he did some of his best work on Bin Laden. Furthermore, the surgeon claims that Bin Laden responded well to hormone treatments, and with her lanky frame and smoldering eyes, could easily work as a model if she chose. Also, it's rumored that Ayman al-Zawahiri will marry Bin Laden as soon as they find the right wedding planner.


UPDATE

I swear that I hadn't gone over to Defamer before composing this post (they day stamp, but don't time stamp their posts, I guess I should just go ahead and accuse them of stealing my idea). They do the Whitney+Osama thing, too. They add some photoshop magic, also (below). Now someone with more skill than me needs to create the Osama as M2F transgendered individual image that will amuse and horrify the internet.

On the One Hand, and Then the Other

(via Drudge)

On the one hand, this man is a dirty old pervert who should be prosecuted.

On the other hand, there are not many of his 77 year old peers who would be able to figure out how to use a camera phone at all, let alone be able to put it to a purpose they find gratifying.

12 September 2006

I Can't Wait Till They Have Something To Really Conspiracy Theorize About


Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and bestest buddy Hugo Chavez are going to visit good friend Fidel Castro and then travel together to New York for some UN sponsored death to America, death to Israel fest on Sept 19th, also known as just another day of meetings of the UN General Assembly.

If they fly on the same plane, that plane is soooooo gonna crash.

Instead of suggesting that theories about 9/11 being concocted by the USA might 'not be absurd', this will give their supporters something to really conspiracy theorize about.

Given that they are most likely to fly on some old Soviet era plane, using Soviet trained pilots, a crash without nefarious reasons behind it, isn't out of the question.

And while I'm at it, Death to both Castros, Death to Chavez, Death to Ahmadinejad, Long Live Freedom in Cuba, Long Live Freedom in Venezuela and Long Live Freedom in Iran those nations will be free of their dictators, if not in a few years, then in a few decades. Freedom isn't easy, but tyrants' hold on their people, though long lasting at times, will eventually slip. In opposition to the inevitable decline of dictatorships, no country with a functioning two or more party democracy of more than a few decades has ever slipped into tyranny, and I suspect none ever will. Democracy has defeated tyranny everywhere they have faced off, the only time tyranny is victorious is when they defeat other tyrannies.

Product Recommendation Posts Rock!

I haven't done the old 'product recommendation' post in awhile, so here it goes (plus I wanted to test using tables to get the product links all in a nice row, rather than in an unwieldy column)

Wolfmother's album is terrific. Yes, it's derivative. Yes, it's loud. Yes, it's been out awhile. And you should order it ASAP if you don't own this great album. Mix lots of Zep, a little White Stripes, a dash of TRex, plenty of Sabbath and just a hint of Soundgarden and you get this. If that sounds like a putdown, it's not, it's a compliment. Power Trios Rock!

Brian DePalma has a new film coming out this Friday. His low-rent Hitchcock act wears thin usually. But not always. One such case where it actually works is Femme Fatale. It's actually a pretty good film. Rebecca Romijn is perfect for the role. This film is a reminder that Antonio Banderas can actually act when given the right material. It's beautifully shot as well. It's not exactly thought provoking, but it's very watchable, and rewatchable, which is important when considering what to DVDs to buy. Hollywood Made, Not Quite Porn, Quality Cheese Rocks!

People who start their Christmas shopping before Thanksgiving, really suck. Nevertheless, it's not too early to think about the kinds of things you might get. For whatever reason, folks don't really think about board games outside of gift giving season. I highly recommend getting the best board game designed by a frenchman inspired by Sumo wrestling, ever (OK, most likely the only game that fits all those qualifiers). Abalone has it all, Strategy, shiny polished balls, and reasonably priced. Easily Learned, Difficult to Master Board Games Rock!

Finally, let's talk tea. For me, there is only one tea worth drinking, and that's Yorkshire Tea Gold. Loose leaf is best, but a hassle, and the bag tea still brews a fine cup or two. It's considerably more expensive than Lipton's, but it's worth it. Aromatic, strong, but lacking in bitterness, I usually drink it with no sugar, no milk, it tastes fine straight, though drinking a strong English tea straight is probably an acquired taste. They recommend drinking this with milk and sugar, but that's for wimps. Finely Crafted English Tea Rocks!














11 September 2006

Rounding Up the Round Ups

It's a day of reflection all over the blogosphere (but not here, just links to others' thoughts).

A good round up of links can be found at Tammy Bruce's blog.

A good round up of left side of the blogosphere reflections can be found at Outside the Beltway, posted by James Joyner (the sinistral are unfortunately predictable in their tone and take on events).

My personal round up of reflections is as follows

  • Prof. Althouse reposts her recollection of her thoughts that day.
  • Victor David Hanson, who's just started blogging, adds his thoughts to the mix.
  • Strategy Page gives a good rundown of where we are in the Global War on Terror.
  • Steven Den Beste posts at ChicagoBoyz and drops some truth about glorious disunity.
  • Andrew Sullivan has been unusually uncrappy all day, just scroll through the archives for the week to see.
  • Reader I Am, posting at Done With Mirrors, writes about not knowing what to write and ends up writing exactly what should be written.
  • Finally, the next President of the United States, has this to say, you should listen to him, and you best vote for him in the primaries and in the general election. The country needs him, or someone like him, leading us into the second decade of the 3rd millennia.

10 September 2006

Sometimes a Gourd is Just a Gourd


From a recent photo journal at Mainichi Daily News

NFL Week One, Results

Let's see how I've done so far . . . (earlier post with predictions, here)

Miami 17 Steelers 28 (I picked Miami in a pick 'em game)
Doh! Charlie Batch MVP!

Denver 10 Rams 18 (I picked Denver -3.5)
Doh! Jake Plummer looked like a rookie (3 picks), that won't happen again this season.

NYJ 23 Tennessee 16 (I picked Tenn -3)
Doh! The Titans must kind of suck, or Chad Pennington might be kind of good, and healthy.

Buffalo 17 New England 19 (I picked NE -8.5)
Doh! Pats got the victory, but they didn't cover, those bastards!

Baltimore 27 Tampa Bay 0 (I picked Tampa -3)
Doh! This is getting monotonous. Not the game of the week I was expecting.

Cincinatti 23 Kansas City 10 (I picked Cincy +3)
Woohoo! Got one right.

Seattle 9 Detroit 6 (I picked Seattle -5.5)
Doh! The Seahawks won, but didn't cover, and Detroit wasn't demolished, just still losers.

Atlanta 20 Carolina 6 (I picked Atlanta +5)
Woohoo! Got another one right. Except wasn't a great game.

Philadelphia 24 Houston 10 (I picked Philly -3.5)
Woohoo! This one was too easy to call to take too much credit for getting it right.

NO 19 Cleveland 14 (I picked NO +3)
Woohoo! I got this right. Reggie Bush looks NFL ready, already. Impressive effort all around from the Saints.

That's it for the early games, update after the late games to follow (record so far 3 woohoos! versus 6 dohs! against the spread)

Also, what's up with which games are being shown in the LA market? The three games being shown today are as follows, CBS showed Denver v. St. Louis and FOX showed NO v. Cleveland and Dallas v. JAX. Fox could have shown ATL v. Car and didn't. I don't get that choice at all. I can understand showing Denver v. St. Louis, for some reason they still think some folks around here care about the Rams. They're wrong, but it's understandable.

Showing the Saints v. the Browns though makes no sense, unless (***conspiracy theory alert***) the NFL knows that the Saints will become Los Angeles Santos around 2009 or 2010. They are prepping the LA market to become Saints fans as NO simply doesn't have the population base to justify an NFL team anymore. The entire state of Louisiana has fewer folks than the county of Los Angeles (4.5M v 10M), plus the NFL wants to bring the Superbowl back to the entertainment capital of the world. The Saints still look like the team most likely to be able to be moved, and since expansion is unlikely, to get a team to LA within the next 3-4 years, that team is going to have to be the Saints.

UPDATE

Late scores coming in.

Dallas 17 at JAX 24 (I picked JAX -2.5)
Woohoo! Jaguars comeback at home after trailing 10-0 and looking bad, turn it around and look like a very good team (as does Dallas, they played well on the road in a tough house).

Chicago 26 at Green Bay 0 (I picked Chi -3.5)
Woohoo! Too easy to call this one, also. Green Bay just isn't very good right now.

SF 27 Arizona 34 (I picked Ari -7.5)
Doh! Closer than anyone should have expected, Kurt Warner had a good game, but their defense let a horrible SF team score too many points, and almost blew the game by allowing a long pass play on 4th down that lead to a a field goal and blowing the recovery of an onside kick that allowed SF to take two desperation shots in the end zone (that late field goal screwed my pick versus the spread, I hate the spread).

(total so far, 5 woohoos! v 7 dohs! with 3 games left, updates to follow)

FINAL UPDATE

Indianapolis 26 NYGiants 21 (I picked Indy -3)
Woohoo! The hype was hype-alicious. But, it turned out to be a good game anyway. Both these teams should be considered serious Superbowl threats. The Giants RB tandem of small and quick Tiki Barber and huge and quick Brandon Jacobs are going to tear up most teams, just not teams with as good of a defense as the Colts.

Minnesota 19 Washington 16 (I picked DC -4.5)
Doh! The Redskins suck. I take back everything I said about them in the previous post (until next week, I think they'll rebound)

San Diego 27 Oakland 0 (I picked SD -3)
Woohoo! Oakland didn't show up, and didn't play with any "Raider Pride". Disgusting, also the Bolts are pretty good.

(final total 7 woohoos! v 8 dohs!, obviously, these picks are for entertainment purposes only)

By Thursday I'll open myself up to more humiliation by presenting my week 2 picks against the spread.