. . . Drudge has posted an earth-shattering thing on his site just now, a photo (above) of a young Hillary Clinton, presumably from her Wellesley days, where she looks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . kinda hot, not even kinda hot, really, really hot.
(I'm thrown for a loop)
The photo is to illustrate one of those 'breaking story' blurbs he does from time to time in anticipation of an article that doesn't have a link yet. In this case, the blurb is, "NYT PLANS YET ANOTHER HILLARY 1968 FLASHBACK; NOTES FROM WELLESLEY... DEVELOPING... ".
Don't know yet if it's a hit piece to prop up Sen. Obama's flagging campaign, or a coronational piece designed to rally 'progressives' around their presumed standard-bearer against the eeevil Republicans. We'll find out later tonight, I guess.
1 comment:
There are few things more attractive than a 20-year-old woman (except the woman I've been married to for almost that long). Good photography -- taking advantage of the best angles, lighting, and soft focus -- helps.
Don't worry. She's still Hillary, whatever she looked like 40 years ago. If symtpoms persist, just remember the hippie photo of her and Bill. This, too, will pass.
Post a Comment